Sick of looking at orange looking girls

a fake tan.
Am I against it?

Honestly, yes.

I reckon people like Sophie Ellis Bextor, Anne Hathaway, Zooey Deschanel are gorgeous.
I'm not a big fan of Scarlett Johansson, but I admit she looks good without any tanning product.
They (obviously) proud of the colour of their skins, even though people think they look like they're sick.
.. which is why you don't see that many nowadays.

"You look healthy and glowing!"

Bullcrap.
How can you say they're healthy when you had a tan?
Just cos you just had a fake tan and your skins became browner doesn't mean your skin actually "glowing" - unless your face is oily then yes i'd say you are glowing.
Until now I still don't see about the healthiness look about fake tan.
Seriously.

Hey, I know what sick people look like..
and albino.

I've been wondering all these times, do they realized how they actually look like?
IMO it's not attractive at all, it reminds me of humpa lumpa from the chocolate factory;
I have no idea why some people think they're attractive! (see reason below)

eww.

Oh hang on.
That dancer from the Australian sytycd called Penny?
She is annoying.
Her high pitch voice is one of the main reason, and oh oh the fake tan!
It's bullshit when the judges said she was an adorable character therefore the audiences love her.
Bullcrap.
Her body is too big for a dancer - maybe I'm being biased but dancer should have a slim bod (that's why they call it an excercise right?).
Her boobs even make it harder to move around.


WAIT A MINUTE.


I don't like her cos she's a bimbo! =D
Yeah.. she reminds me of Kim Kardashian..
I can't stand bimbo girls.

The other dancer that had a really bad fake tan was that blonde girl (wavy hair). Chanelle?
Gee she's orange.

Oh oh, there's another one.
That girl from the Biggest Loser (last year)! What's her name?
Anyways, yes she lost alot of weight and she's a size 10 now but Oh-My-God, someone please give her a mirror so she can see what's wrong with her look.
She needs a new stylist!!

After School VS the other girlband (you know who)

I honestly kinda stopped listening to kpop since they became all cutesy groups (and singer) and such. Yes I know - it's the culture over there and people (teenagers) like them because they're.. cute.
Which I find it fair - IMO it's better that way than liking girl band that offer sex appeal too much to the younger generation.
I may sound.. old - but wait til I finish writing this down.

Anyways back to the topic.
I was browsing soompi and found this thread about a new kpop group called "After School".
Link
I knew that they were prolly using a school girl look to get more attention in kpop industry.
Hyori is prolly one of the singer out there that's using sex appeal to get more money (and audiences). Honestly though, she cant sing nor dance (come on, do you really think she can do it?)
Actually, IVY was too but she somehow didn't make it (scandal bla bla).
I'm just giving a good example since Hyori is very popular among.. well.. people that listen to kpop. or asian pop. whatever.
So yeah, I checked out their youtube video and the first thing that came in my mind was "Holy crap they're hot."
Not "OMG PCD wannabe. Slut."
Or "Good bod, shit song." >> well I didn't really like the song at first, but it's stuck in my head now. (you know, those feeling when you hear song like Poker Face which I think is shit but i just can't get it out of my head)

Seriously though, at first I thought they use too much sex appeal, but if you compare it with Hyori they're not actually that bad o_o since they can actually dance.

But I'm wrong. Yes it's prolly too much sex appeal going on there in Korea, or Asia in general (not Japan, though) but compare to the western society, it's not that bad.

So.. what am I trying to say?
(*looks at title*)

Well,
most girlbands has more than 3 members, but honestly, how many of them that are actually pretty?
yes they're hot but I don't find them attractive (not in a lesbian way, but in industry way) because they're ugly.
N***LE ISN'T PRETTY. OPEN YOUR EYES.
No, I'm not biased because AS (After School) members are asians and I'm Asian too.

Let me put it this way,
I'd rather watch good looking (and good bod) girlband (and can actually dance) rather than alright (or even ugly) looking girlband (eventho they can dance or w/e).

What else?
Hmm, did I mention they don't show their horniness (if there's such a word) on TV?
I'm sick of looking at ugly looking girls doing pole dancing on MTV and tried to sing but in fact they couldn't.
They don't show their tits (okay I'm exaggerating it a little bit), but hey they show their legs alot and I don't think that's bad (since I always want to have those long and slender legs) - while the other girlband on TV nowadays show their cleavage too much.
Waaaay too much.
Legs are way better than boobs.
They do show their stomach a lot.
Well it's a show, if you do it irl then you're stupid.

Oh right, the dance.
I don't honestly find the dance erotic compare to the other girlband.
Well as far as I know they (haven't) used anything sexually explicit tool such as that pole thing or anything.

But hey, those are my personal opinion.
You can say that they're Asian, and I'm Asian, that's why I made this post.
or that they're just copying this other girlband and don't have the originality.

Well, that other girlband isn't original either is it?
It's just that because the world becoming more and more "demanding" on the entertainment industry, the record company need to sell something too don't they?
well there you go, Spice Girls with a little bit of spice.

Hang on, one more thing.
All the members do actually sing.
Not two. ALL of them.

OH.
They don't wear that much make up.

So yeah,
those girls are just trying to sell records just like the other girlband do.
It's just they have different way to sell their records.
In my way anyway.